Sanity Check: Bangalore international airport rail link

153

Written By Devesh - 6 October, 2008

BIAL Bangalore PPP Analysis HSRL public transport Mobilicity Metro Rail

[Cross posted from My Blog]

The Karnataka state government is tripping over itself trying to expedite the High Speed Rail Link (HSRL) to the new Bengaluru International Airport (BIA), conservatively expected to cost Rs. 5,200 - Rs. 5,700 Crore by completion date, somewhere by 2012.


The HSRL project has been put on the fast track, and the Karnataka State Industrial Investment and Development Corporation Limited (KSIIDC) has already published a Request for Qualification (RFQ) document on its website. KSIIDC is expected to announce the short-list by October 21. The letter of award to the bidder is estimated for February 16, 2009. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC), is the project consultant.

The City Airport Terminal (CAT), the starting point of the HSRL is on Parade Ground next to the Chinnaswamy Stadium on M.G. Road, with stations at Hebbal and Yelahanka. The final station will be at BIA. The first three stations will be elevated, and the BIA station is has not been determined as yet.

I am confused on some aspects of the HSRL when trying to do a sanity check.

Sanity Check 1: Who is the target customer of the HSRL ?
In 2012, assuming the global economy revives in the next 12 months, oil prices reduce drastically, and BIAL's ambition of a south India hub comes true, I can project a maximum growth to 30 million passengers. Which translates to about 500,000 passengers, up and down, per week. Assuming 60% of passengers use the HSRL, this translates to a maximum of 300,000 trips per week.

Assuming 20,000 workers at the airport, if airport workers are added, then the number of weekly trips can increase 50% to 450,000 trips.

The time-table of "airport city" where another 100,000 people are expected to work is unknown at this time. When airport city reaches peak capacity we can assume another 250,000 trips per week.

Each category of person has differing needs.

Sanity Check 2: Convenience
The Central Business District (CBD) which includes M.G. Road area is completely choked with traffic. How many travellers are willing endure the pain and hardship to come to the CAT, and then take a train.

HSRL passengers from Central, South and South East part of Bangalore can still be expected to use the CAT, since it is on the way to the airport. Those from the western, eastern, and north-western suburbs are not going to spend enormous amounts of time deviating from the shortest possible route to come to the CAT. It is unclear if there is a park and ride facility at Hebbal.

Sanity Check 3: Close integration with Namma Metro and BMTC
A lack of close integration with the Metro is another area due for a sanity check. Integration with the Metro is vital for the long term success of the HSRL as it will provide the distributed connectivity to various parts of the city. As per my understanding, the Minsk Square metro station will be connected by a 200 meter walkway to the CAT. 200 meters with luggage does not remotely qualify as integration. There is no information available on whether the Vayu Vajra service will be linked to the CAT.

Sanity Check 4: Affordability
Passengers want to get to the airport in the shortest amount of time and are willing to pay a premium, but the airport worker wants affordability. BMTC has been forced to offer monthly passes on its much vaunted Vayu Vajra service for Rs. 2,500 per month, which translates to Rs. 50 per trip (compared to a planned Rs. 200 on the HSRL), and even this most workers and businesses find expensive.

Sanity Check 5: Financial Viability
If the HSRL will not cater to airport workers, then traffic will drop to 300,000 trips per week. Even at 500,000 trips per week, and at Rs. 200 a trip, the gross revenue will be about Rs. 520 Crore per year. A profit after tax (PAT) of 10% will result in an annual profit of just about Rs. 52 Crore, ridiculously small for a 5,000+ Cr outlay.

I have tremendous regard for Mr. E. Sreedharan, especially his construction achievements on the Konkan railway and DMRC, but DMRC does not enjoy the best of reputations on financial transparency. Sunil Jain's Rational Expectations article in today's Business Standard is a good reality check on how DMRC manipulates or suppresses figures to project a rosy picture, when in reality, it is not.

I am the first person to stand in the Yes column when it comes to better connectivity to BIA, including the HSRL. However, at a time when Karnataka has more pressing infrastructural and social needs, a detailed sanity check is required to ensure the HSRL does not turn out to be another white elephant draining the precious public coffers.

-----------------------

Regards

Devesh R. Agarwal

Visit my aviation blog at http://aviation.deveshagarwal.com

 

COMMENTS


Dishum Dishum

idontspam - 16 February, 2009 - 13:56

E Sreedharan @ 3000 cr or MN Sreehari @ 18000 cr, who is right with 600% gap in HSRL cost estimate?

Engineer's dream, Citizen's nightmare

s_yajaman - 17 February, 2009 - 05:46

Srinidhi,

Exactly.  The tone seems to be - "How dare you people come in the way of my pet project?  Don't confuse me with data, my mind is made up".  We have many of these engineering marvels in Bangalore today - the Richmond Circle flyover, the cable bridge. The BETL will get added shortly to this list.

It costs only Rs.3800 crores as per him.  We can have a BIAL branch near Sarjapur Road for that amount ;).

Srivathsa

 

Beg to differ with the big man

s_yajaman - 16 February, 2009 - 14:16

With due respect to Mr.Sreedharan, this borders on blackmail - "listen to me or else...".  If the project is indeed as profitable, then there will be no dearth of private players.  What are their names now that he says someone has come forward to do this.

Some basic questions from dimwits like me

a. Why can't Metro run on pillars?  Why land acquisition for Metro and none for HSRL?  Apples vs. elephants (not even oranges)

b. Metro cannot be implemented under the PPP model.  Is this the 11th Commandment from the Bible?

c. Where has been stated that we need to travel in 23 minutes to BIAL?  Can we have something that costs Rs.1000 crores and takes us in 45 mins?  Has such an option even been considered?

d.  With Bangalore getting into the league of ... HSRL is unavoidable.  Tautological - HSRL is needed because HSRL is unavoidable.

e. Metro not ideal for connecting far off places.  Singapore's EW line runs more than 35 km from Pasir Ris to Boon Lay.

f. Metro to airport not part of CTTP.  Big Deal.  High time Metro to North Bangalore was included in the CTTP.

g. Metro not viable unless 25000/hr.  And HSRL is viable at 15000/day?  This seems to come from the Bush School of Voodoo economics.

h. HSRL is cheaper than Metro.  For whom?  the passenger? the government? the non-airport using public.  Please clarify.

h. Any talk of alternative will derail HSRL .  If this is a good reason to build HSRL, I wonder what sort of thinking has gone into this project.

Srivathsa

 

 

 

Extend the Metro...

Ravi_D - 17 February, 2009 - 03:54

... and run a limited stop airport link rolling stock every 30 minutes or so for faster connectivity.

Srivatsa: Don't you think all we need would be an extra line and associated signalling in the stations without stops? That should not add much to the overall cost. I've seen many such bypass lines in Paris where faster trains zoom past stations.

Ravi

HSRL is cheaper and ideal: Sreedharan S Praveen Dhaneshkar,P M Raghunandan,DH News Service,Bangalore: DMRC Chief E Sreedharan has warned the State government that any talk of an alternative to high speed rail link to Bangalore International Airport at this juncture, would dissuade and discourage the private companies, which have come forward to implement the project. “The government should never think of a metro to the airport in the present context and once the HSRL is in position, there will be no need for a metro at all,” he stated in the letter to the CM. According the DMRC MD, HSRL costs only Rs 3,800 crore, while metro to BIA costs at least Rs 5,000 crore. Moreover, the government has to make huge investments as equity for metro, while HSRL is proposed on public private partnership model and the government would spend only a small amount. 13 REASONS FAVOURING HSRL *HSRL is cheaper than metro *Metro needs large scale land acquisition *Metro travel time from city to BIA is one hour, HSRL 23 minutes *Metro cannot be implemented under PPP model *Metro not ideal for connecting far off places like BIA *Metro cannot have check-in facilities *Metro connecting airport in other countries hardly patronised *Metro to airport is not part of CTTP plan *Metro needs heavy subsidies, HSRL does not need any. *HSRL doesn’t need much land as it runs on pillars *Metro is viable only if the ridership is over 25,000 per hour per direction *With B’lore getting into the league of major international cities, HSRL is unavoidable * Any talk of alternative will de-rail proposed HSRL source:http://bangalorebuzz.blogspot.com/2009/01/hsrl-is-cheaper-and-ideal-sreedharan.html

PRAJA.IN COMMENT GUIDELINES

Posting Guidelines apply for comments as well. No foul language, hate mongering or personal attacks. If criticizing third person or an authority, you must be fact based, as constructive as possible, and use gentle words. Avoid going off-topic no matter how nice your comment is. Moderators reserve the right to either edit or simply delete comments that don't meet these guidelines. If you are nice enough to realize you violated the guidelines, please save Moderators some time by editing and fixing yourself. Thanks!