Government, BMTC - Do courts needs to tell you?

138

Written By kbsyed61 - 26 October, 2010

Bangalore BMTC Bus Zones Media Reports Courts Routing Transportation public transport

"The Karnataka High Court on Monday directed the state government to constitute an expert committee to look into the feasibility of implementing the BMTC feeder bus service.

While hearing the public interest litigation filed by N Parameswaran, a retired employee of HAL, Chief Justice J S Khehar directed the government to constitute an expert committee consisting of one technical expert to examine the possibility of adopting the service in the city. The report should be submitted within four weeks to the court, the bench stated.

The petitioner had submitted that he had designed a comprehensive feeder bus service system in the city and as planned, commuters would get three to four buses to reach the destination. The petitioner argued that with this service commuters could reach their destination without changing buses. "The feeder bus service will provide frequent services to commuters and 50 feeder roads and 50 trunk roads are enough to implement this project," he argued.

For the full report in the New Indian Express, click here

May be this team should set up a dialogue with the die-hard Mr Parameswaran and check on the feasibility of his scheme, if its decision is to continue with the monopoly BMTC, which is where I differ. - Murali

 

Note: I am upgrading the news item that Muarli sir had posted as comments in other minibus post to discussion post for some focus discussion on this topic

COMMENTS


Vasanth - you said it well. Instead of working around the problem, quality of interchanges needs to be improved, its a really critical broken link in Bus based PT today in Bangalore. Fit case for a Praja Advocacy/lobbying project, with 3-4 big interchange hubs as pilots, pushing BBMP/BDA etc with some goood designs.

Lets discuss the M Parameswran here

kbsyed61 - 26 October, 2010 - 14:59

Lets discuss the issues related to Mr. Params's PIL and the court ruling here.

there will be no further news

silkboard - 27 October, 2010 - 02:59

Coverage of specific court cases like these is very poor. I doubt we will have more news to discuss on this. And its so hard to find the details of ruling and petition itself on the High Court websites.

Speaking of which, wouldn't we all benefit if court cases were easy to track, with all details (evidences presented and argued, judgements delivered so far) of cases available online? Is it the case today? Haven't checked recently.

As for routing itself, minibuses thread is okay, minibuses are key part of routing scheme anyway :)

Bangaloreans as well as in any city of India, people are reluctant to change multiple buses. This we all know is due to:

1. Buses not stopping in bus stops, stopping behind or ahead of bus stop or in the centrelane of road and expecting passengers to board the bus in centre lane. Getting into one bus and coming out of itself is tiring due to drivers bad habits.

2. Changing multiple buses needs walking on bad or non-existent foot paths making it very tiring and builds up frustation resulting in giving up public transport for further trips. Especially for the aged and ladies and in night times, it is very difficult.

3. If you get one bus, you won't get other. You will end up with multiple wait cycles leading to increased travel time.

4. If you compare a private transport with public transport, private transport gives end to end non-stop nowait apart from jams scenario. People mostly look for end to end connectivity or maximum one hop.

5. Fares for the trip will also increase due to multiple hops.

Incase if Parameswaran model is implemented, it may result in less usage of public transportation.

I agree

Bheema.Upadhyaya - 31 October, 2010 - 16:42

Adding to Syed, not an integrated  approach should be adopted but keeping the future growth of city, human/vehicular population. I hope there are adequate planning tools/methods/models to estimate the 360 degree growth projection.


PRAJA.IN COMMENT GUIDELINES

Posting Guidelines apply for comments as well. No foul language, hate mongering or personal attacks. If criticizing third person or an authority, you must be fact based, as constructive as possible, and use gentle words. Avoid going off-topic no matter how nice your comment is. Moderators reserve the right to either edit or simply delete comments that don't meet these guidelines. If you are nice enough to realize you violated the guidelines, please save Moderators some time by editing and fixing yourself. Thanks!