BIAL is public authority: SIC

121

Written By lraman_in - 19 August, 2008

BIAL Bangalore PPP RTI Media Reports

In a landmark judgment, the State Information Commission ruled on Monday that Bangalore International Airport Limited comes under the purview of the Right to Information Act. The judgment is expected to have far reaching effects on other PPP projects in the state. See: BIAL is public authority.

Acting on a petition referred by the high court, a full Bench of the commission declared BIAL as a public authority as defined by the RTI Act and held it was duty-bound to provide information to citizens.

[pruned out to front page {blr_editor}]

COMMENTS


impact on other PPPs?

silkboard - 19 August, 2008 - 10:18

Is BMIC a PPP? Does this ruling apply to only infrastructure/monopolistic type PPPs, or all types?

We know where this is headed next - appeal back to the high court and further up. A legal battle. But its an important one. Norms of transparency are simply not defined for these large PPPs. What would a PPP like BIAL (with no real trade secret or IP, nor competetion) be trying to hide? Perhaps their profit margins and planned gestation periods?

How do these PPPs hand out contracts? What stops them from favoring a public official or representative in 'return' for some favors?

How do these PPPs determine the extent of public grant or support needed (land, lease period etc)? Can't rule out possibility of "favors" being in the play here as well.

Watching with interest.

Long drawn battle out there!

kbsyed61 - 19 August, 2008 - 14:27

 

 This battle of bringing BIAL under the ambit of RTI act is going to be long drawn battle. I am very confident that this will go all the way to supreme court. I am bit optimistic that one day BIAL and all other PPP projects will be brought under RTI act .

 This is great oppurtunity for the governments to enusre that the upcoming PPP projects are brought under the RTI act right from day one.

 Benson Issac, deserves appreciation and our support for leading that necessary battle. Thank you Benson Sir.

 

A landmark judgement!

mcadambi - 19 August, 2008 - 15:27

I am very pleased to know the SIC has ruled that BIAL should be subject to RTI petitions.

In a few days from now, we will also know how the Honourable Supreme Court rules about the legal frameworkf of the Concession Agreement vis-a-vis the MRTP Act. 

 

The RTI and MRTP battle with BIAL will be interesting one. IF BIAL is declared a public authority/interest project for RTI purposes, then it can not be subjected to MRTP act. Because govt gencies/enterprises are exempt from MRTP provisions. Basically both (RTI and MRTP) runs counter to each other in BIAL.

 For more on MRTP read @ http://www.helplinelaw.com/docs/main.php3?id=MRTP1

 

BIAL is not like BMRCL

mcadambi - 19 August, 2008 - 17:48

BMRCL is a public undertaking in the framework of the term government. BIAL is a private company involved more for profits rather than for value addition unlike BMRCL. For BMRCL, only an operational profit is suffecient, whereas sky is the limit for BIAL when it comes to profits.

Therefore, it makes sense to consider BMRCL and a stricter governmental undetaking and BIAL as a monopolistic predator.

BIAL signed a concession agreement with the Government of India and hence is a private concessionaire. According to Shri Vinod Dhall, former Chairman of the Competition Commission of India, all PPPs and Concession Agreements have to be subject to MRTP and other Competition acts.


PRAJA.IN COMMENT GUIDELINES

Posting Guidelines apply for comments as well. No foul language, hate mongering or personal attacks. If criticizing third person or an authority, you must be fact based, as constructive as possible, and use gentle words. Avoid going off-topic no matter how nice your comment is. Moderators reserve the right to either edit or simply delete comments that don't meet these guidelines. If you are nice enough to realize you violated the guidelines, please save Moderators some time by editing and fixing yourself. Thanks!