HOT TOPICS
SPOTLIGHT AGENCIES
Right is there; but, no information
Written By murali772 - 14 July, 2010
Bangalore governance RTI Media Reports Others
Following (in italics) are the relevant excerpts from the New Indian Express report:
The government may have enacted a law empowering citizens to demand information from public authorities, but five years later many government departments are yet to take the “first step” towards proactive disclosure. Section 4(1)(b) of the RTI act mandates that all authorities under the purview of the law must index, catalogue and computerise official records to be easily accessed by the people. So far, however, few departments have paid heed to the provision, says K A Thippeswamy, Karnataka State Information Commissioner. The progress, he said, has been “almost negligible”. “They (departments) do not even have a record room to keep documents,” he said. “They were supposed to do it within six months of the Act coming into force. But it’s been five years and they are yet to do it.’’
Another stipulation, often ignored, is that every public authority has to publish sixteen categories of information ranging from particulars of the organisation, powers and duties of its officers, employees, categories of documents that are held by it. Thippedwamy said it is not sufficient to publish the information once, the public authority is obliged to update it every year. “Since we live in the age of Internet, the information should be updated is updated on the website.”
The relevant Sec 4 (2) reads: "It shall be a constant endeavour of every public authority to take steps in accordance with the requirements of clause (b) of sub-section (1) to provide as much information suo motu to the public at regular intervals through various means of communications, including internet, so that the public have minimum resort to the use of this Act to obtain information".
RTI activist and coordinator of RTI study centre, Veeresh, said due to the non-implementation of section 4(1) of the Act, the information is denied. When challenged in the Commission, the case gets delayed due to large number of cases pending, he added. ‘’There are 10,000 cases pending before the commission, and it takes five months before the case comes up for hearing,” he said.
Three of my appeals too are presently pending with the the CIC, one dated 16th April, and the other two dated 28th June. So, it will be only Sept/ Oct before the first one comes up for hearing - not a satisfactory state of affairs. Of the three, at least one is a straight forward case of refusal of information, which will mean the official concerned will have to pay the penalty at Rs 250/- per day. But, with maximum limited to Rs 25,000/-, which will become applicable in this case, perhaps the official is not too worried. But, doesn't the fact that it will go into his personal records, act as a deterrent?
Muralidhar Rao
COMMENTS
murali772 - 20 July, 2010 - 12:16
Since, the penalty for 'no/ delayed response' to a query can be levied only by the Information Commissioner, it appears the Principal Information Officers (PIOs) are deliberately remaining silent, at least until the queryist decides to take the matter to the appeal level, like has been my experience here.
In a way, this may be OK in that it will tend to weed out many frivolous queries. But, in the process, many genuine queries can also get kept waiting unnecessarily. And, any way, if one wants to pursue that matter also, there is the provision in the Act.
Whatever, this is a point worth noting.
Pile up of cases with 4 KIC posts vacant
murali772 - 6 August, 2010 - 08:23
If you apply for information under the RTI Act to the Karnataka Information Commission (KIC), the chances are you will be heard only after several months. With over 10,000 cases on hand and just three state information commissioners to hear them, the KIC is working overtime to clear cases. The commissioners complain that if their numbers are not increased, the situation will not improve. Coalition Against Corruption (CAC) members have petitioned the governor, chief minister and opposition leader to appoint more commissioners, but there has been no change in the situation so far.
The commissioners have a grouse against RTI activists. Information Commissioner S J Virupakshaiah said, “The problem is that there are too many RTI activists who appeal on petty issues. Due to this, the commission ends up delaying hearings for needy people.”
For the full text of the report in the Bangalore Mirror, click here
It may be true that petty issues are being taken to the KIC level, even when they can be sorted out at the PIO or appeals level in the respective departments themselves. But, for that, it's the department heads who are to blame. Three of my cases are in the queue before the KIC. They needn't have gone to that level if the respective department heads had been proactive in sorting them out. They are only interested in passing the buck.
murali772 - 24 September, 2010 - 06:12
The Right to Information Act is indeed a very powerful tool, and using it, activists across the country have been prying into various misdeeds by government officials, and bringing them to account, one by one. Naturally, the corrupt/ lazy officials are not quite happy, and have been trying to figure out various ways to stymie its effectiveness. Towards this, an attempt was first made to emasculate the Act by mooting some amendments to certain critical sections. With the civil society sensing this, and opposing it with all its might, that attempt was given up, at least temporarily.
The present strategy, at least in Karnataka, seems to be
1) Not to respond at all, which discourages many, particularly first timers.
2) If the queryist persists with an appeal, the strtegy changes to obfuscation, or passing on the buck (onto some other department, whether directly connected or not). In the process, many more get eliminated.
3) The persistent few are then left with no option other than to go to the state Information Commission. But, because of this strategy of the officialdom, the Information Commission has been getting progressively burdened, with backlogs building up to well over 6 months (Presently, there are three queries of mine pending with the IC, the oldest of them dated 16th April, '10). In addition is the problem of vacancies in the IC, with only two Commissioners functioning currently, where there should be ten. One would like to believe that the non-fulfilment of the vacancies is not part of the grand strategy, involving the entire state officialdom. But, one doesn't know, particularly when the position has remained this way for far too long.
How does the civil society want to counter this? Or, is it just giving up, saying there's no beating the 'babu' at his game?
silkboard - 24 September, 2010 - 09:36
Another problem is lack of information managment systems inside the government. Its still mostly paper driven. Soft copies (of meeting notes etc) exist, but are either scans of typed (and at times printed!!) paper, or are stored on random PCs and machines without any tagging or categorization.
Add this to the general lack of motivation to share, and you can explain why RTI process is slow, and most public agencies so non-compliant.
If a government department is willing, we can help advise at least on information management systems part. But seems like there is no easy way for us to get in and help.
murali772 - 28 September, 2010 - 09:54
Mr Ravindranath Guru of Kria katte wrote to me as below:
Dear Muralidhar Rao
Glad to know that you have taken interest in the implementation of RTI In Karnataka. We would like to bring it to your kind notice that we in KRIA Katte have taken up the cause on a continuous basis and we have sent letters to Governor (and met him in Aug 09) CM, Chief Secretary, Leader Of Opposition and the Law Minister Shri Suresh Kimar. The Main Problem is the present Govt is not interested in the success of RTI. To highlight these, we have planned a Press Conference on 11th October 2010 which will be addressed by Dr BK Chandrashekar and Dr. Samuel Paul. You are welcome to attend.
PRAJA.IN COMMENT GUIDELINES
Posting Guidelines apply for comments as well. No foul language, hate mongering or personal attacks. If criticizing third person or an authority, you must be fact based, as constructive as possible, and use gentle words. Avoid going off-topic no matter how nice your comment is. Moderators reserve the right to either edit or simply delete comments that don't meet these guidelines. If you are nice enough to realize you violated the guidelines, please save Moderators some time by editing and fixing yourself. Thanks!