HOT TOPICS
SPOTLIGHT AGENCIES
BWSSB Rain Water Harvesting rules
Written By sanjayv - 24 September, 2009
Bangalore BWSSB Water Review Others Everything else RWH
Folks, The draft rules for the BWSSB Rain Water Harvesting Amendment Act 2009 have been published on the BWSSB website. They have generously provided one whole week for feedback from the general public. See the rules here.
Please review the rules if you are interested. I am not sure how detailed "rules" are supposed to be? My understanding is that the rules are what translate the intent of the act to practice.
However, a first reading is disappointing to me. The rules do not specify any standards for the design or qualifications for a designer. Linking the design to a published standard, if available. There is no clarity of how "quality" will be ensured. There is no clarity on what percentage of built up area should be harvested. Will someone who harvests from part of their roof qualify? What if the RWH system goes into disuse after a certain number of years.
Original amendment can be found here:
The key text of the amendment is as follows:
“72A. Obligation to provide rain water harvesting structure.- Within nine months from the date of commencement of the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage (Amendment) Act, 2009, every owner or occupier of a building having a sital area of 2400 square feet and above or every owner who propose to construct a building on a sital area of 1200 square feet and above, shall provide for rain water harvesting structure in such manner, with such conditions as may be provided in the regulations, failing which the Board may cause such rain water harvesting structure and recover the cost from the owner or occupier, as the case may be, as arrears of land revenue".
COMMENTS

- Section 7 & 8 of the document seem to be a repetition.
- The rules talk about "owner who constructs", it does not talk about builders who construct apartments etc. These rules may be questioned later, since apartment owners typically will not have 1200 sq ft of land in their name. Hence rules should be modified to bring in the aspect of shared housing. ( any construction within a plot area of 1200 sqfts or more should have water harvesting installed by the owners individually or collectively) ( appliable to apartments, housing colonies etc)
- The rules assume storage for 2 cm of rainfall ( roof top). Is this adequate ? ( similarly 1cm for ground)
- any covered land ( concrete, tar etc) should be considered similar to roof tops (open cemented parking lots etc)
- at least, Quality of water used to recharge through borewells should be specified as it is going directly into the water table. ( i have not had a look at IS10500)
- the document uses the term appropriate - to clarify what is appropriate and what is not, examples should be specified so that the courts can interpret better in case of dispute.
- the only penal action specified is that BWSSB can build RWH systems and levy the cost from the owners. In addition to this BWSSB should have authority to charge fines ( which could be compounded with time) ( to be fixed in the rules) till such systems are installed and then charge the cost of the system. This will ensure that the citizens will install RWH systems.
- The period of 9 months is a short time period for existing constructions. This should be extended to, say 2 years.
Sanjay, would be great if you could coordinate to collect feedback from praja and send it.
Tarle, hoping to hear from you on this.

thampan - 25 September, 2009 - 02:32
- to ensure effective implementation, BWSSB approvals should not be given to any new project ( if RWH is applicable) without RWH in the plans after 12 months of these rules being applicable.
- for existing constructions, the owners should be mandated to submit the master plan for RWH within one year of the rules being applicable and implementation within two years.
- There should be a competent authority setup to review the plans and inspect RWH installations.
- The efficacy of RWH installations should be measured through self submissions and random checks

sanjayv - 25 September, 2009 - 06:32
Please post your views and have a vigorous discussion. Like it or not, this law will directly impact almost all of us. So imagine that you have to install a RWH system within 9 months (if one is not already present). What is required so that this will be a robust practice for years to come. The amendment conveniently put everything on the framed "rules and regulations". I will do the job of compiling and sending to BWSSB.
Does anyone here have any knowledge of how the Chennai experience went? What were the learnings there?

RKCHARI - 25 September, 2009 - 12:05
How about something like this?
I have not touched on other legalese issues - just stuck to wording the technical aspect more scientifically.
Happy more suggesting!
Chari

Hi SanjayV,
I am submitting some additional inputs to ensure concerns of quality and qualification of persons installing the unit for the home owner is addressed. It is not just a question of collecting water from roofs and open areas, filtering and storing. There is a science behind the entire process to get maximum mileage from this God given gift. Let me see how best I can address these issues.
Similarly for infiltration and ground water table recharge. It has to be done scientifically capturing 100% and ensuring 0% runb-offs.
Shall keep Prajagalus in the loop.
Regards
Chari
PRAJA.IN COMMENT GUIDELINES
Posting Guidelines apply for comments as well. No foul language, hate mongering or personal attacks. If criticizing third person or an authority, you must be fact based, as constructive as possible, and use gentle words. Avoid going off-topic no matter how nice your comment is. Moderators reserve the right to either edit or simply delete comments that don't meet these guidelines. If you are nice enough to realize you violated the guidelines, please save Moderators some time by editing and fixing yourself. Thanks!