HOT TOPICS
SPOTLIGHT AGENCIES
Namma Raste - road use efficiency
Written By silkboard - 5 August, 2008
Traffic Bangalore Corridors Road widening research ESG Citizen Reports
Read in an email this morning that on 19th July 2008, a workshop on “Reclaiming Bangalore’s roads: Namma Raste” was jointly organized by Environment Support Group (ESG), CIVIC Bangalore and Alternative Law Forum at Vidyadeep, Ulsoor Road, Bangalore.
The context for this meeting was the PIL against BBMP over widening of 91 roads. Apparently, the claim is that the widening projects will increase average vehicle speeds from 8-10 km/hr to 40 km/hr (ref: material from ESG/HU - these should soon be up on ESG website, so I will save myself copy paste jobs here).
The workshop had over 90 participants, ranging from representatives of traders’ associations, resident association federations, and organizations working with the differently abled & for the urban poor, groups working on pedestrian rights, architects, schools, colleges and members of Hasiru Usiru.
I know there is a set of people who consider extreme environmental activism as anti-development. Put those biases aside for just a moment, and think about road widening efforts or flyovers that have come up in your area. Then, if you commute more than 5-6 km, tell us if your commute time has improved. Think and tell if there is enough proof that these projects help. Save for just a few flyovers, they don't!
I can give you an example from my area. My wife takes 45 mins today to do 9 km from Whitefield to IRR/Domlur area. It used to take asbout the same time (50 mins) to do Whitefield to Langford town two years ago. What has happened over last two years? Well, let me list them all
- Airport is gone, and hence a lot of vehicles.
- There is a new 6 lane railway overbridge at Marathahalli
- Marathahalli market area road has now been 'widened'.
- Airport road itself saw some limited 'widening'
- The road from Kundalahalli to Marathahalli too has been 'widened'
Despite all this, the speeds have reduced, ~ 20 kmph, to 10 kmph in this example. When you discuss this with self proclaimed urban development experts, the reason given is - there are more people and vehicles now.
Okay, alright. But isn't that the problem we should be attacking here!? More you build, more they come - that just can't be the excuse for misguided investments with undefined RoI (return on investment). The effort has to be to reduce usage of private vehicles for office commute. Investments have to be go towards managing whatever road resources we have. Past all that, we can look at adding more road area.
Lets put a number to the efficiency with which we use our road resources (I will post a whole lot of pictures to prove this point). Remember our talk of entropy, turbulence and all that? Every 200 meters, you either have
- encroached or missing pavement, leading to pedestrians on the road
- car parked on the arterial road (tons at Marathahalli)
- Some construction happening, with construction material spilling on to the road
- Bikers riding wrong side, autos criss crossing, blah blah blah - you know all this too well.
I would say that Bangalore's road use efficiency is probably about 40%. What I mean to say is that if the traffic and road space was managed to perfection, we can handle the same number of vehicles with 40% of road space.
Now, do widened roads add to this efficiency? 5% increase in road area gives you 2% increase in capacity to handle vehicles. That 2% increase in capacity to handle vehicles can come from efforts to increase road use efficiency itself. The question of course is -
- How I arrived at these numbers, plus
- would it cost less to increase road use efficiency.
Lets collaborate on a paper right here to arrive at rough numbers on road use efficiency. But I am willing to bet that #2 is true. Its not just that it will cost less to invest in increasing road use efficiency, but, this approach has better guarantee of success than investing in widening more roads and building more meaningless flyovers.
I have not rested my case yet. I need help to build that road use efficiency number :)
COMMENTS
blrpraj - 5 August, 2008 - 21:15
Vasanth - 5 August, 2008 - 08:01
Best solution lies in the guided transportation - preferrably elevated. I think BLRSRI is fan of light rail and seems to be pushing it. But, elevated guided rail in the form of full fledged Metro or Mono is the solution. Light rail again will get struck in signals and traffic jams.
Srivatsa's dream to travel at 40 km/hr atleast in the city can be only fulfilled by these means - not even ferrari on the road.
blrsri - 5 August, 2008 - 08:28
The only reason I stick to LRT is because of it prevalance..apart from Vagas/Disneyland/Kualalumpur and some japanese ciites..monorail has not made much impact.. Seattle monorail project was also shelved..may be the whys could be a different topic for discussion
For me the industry corridors need guided transport EC and ITPL area..this will stop mindless commutes!
blrsri - 5 August, 2008 - 06:41
as can be seen from SB's pic..the 3 lane road has been turned into a 5 lane traffic and this 3 lane road is shortened to a 2 lane road at the marthahalli junction and further down the road it becomes 2.5 lanes infront of BrandFactory and then again reduces to 1.5 lane near the temple/hump..
Instead all that is needed is to have a uniform 2 lane road with proper parking structures and bus bays and the traffic will be as smooth..whos to listen!
Also, the HAL airport road(from Trinity circle - ITPL) is the best candidate for an LRT route as it has few junctions unlike many other roads..just putting this line will remove all jams on this road!
"Instead all that is needed is to have a uniform 2 lane road with proper parking structures and bus bays and the traffic will be as smooth"
You said it. So we go back to road engineering, marking, signs etc... all roads leading to chaos starts and ends with the above. How do we make the right people understand? Koti rupai prashne. We are still trying to find out who the right people are.
PRAJA.IN COMMENT GUIDELINES
Posting Guidelines apply for comments as well. No foul language, hate mongering or personal attacks. If criticizing third person or an authority, you must be fact based, as constructive as possible, and use gentle words. Avoid going off-topic no matter how nice your comment is. Moderators reserve the right to either edit or simply delete comments that don't meet these guidelines. If you are nice enough to realize you violated the guidelines, please save Moderators some time by editing and fixing yourself. Thanks!