HOT TOPICS
SPOTLIGHT AGENCIES
The upcoming BMR bill - draft
Written By silkboard - 29 March, 2010
Bangalore governance Kasturi Rangan urban development Abide Reforms Decentralisation Citizen Reports
Continuing from the mention of two clear asks post BBMP elections, here is a regional governance reform proposal being prepared by Abide. The close to final draft of Bangalore Metropolitan Regional governance act is attached. Here are some mention worthy points. Detailed review will be very much appreciated by those who may be looking for them. Talk sense and less-rhetoric as much as possible please.
- It incorporates recommendations from Kasturirangan Committee report as well as Abide task force's regional governance act, 2009
- Talks of amendments to several existing acs including Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, BMRDA act, BDA act etc.
- Talks of a broader Metropolitan Planning Committee (MPC), 2/3rd members elected from amongst the elected members of the municipal corporation and municipalities, 1/3rd nominated by state government.
- MPC to be responsible for creating development plan with due regards to plans prepared by local authorities in the Bangalore Metro Region.
- MPC would have a smaller, 7 people strong Metro Planning Board (MPB. MPB would be the executive head of MPC.
- MPB is supposed to create multiple separate committees with focus on areas of Planning, Transportation, Environment, Sanitation, Arts/Heritage etc. Total 6 such Sectoral committees.
- There would be a Bangalore Metropolitan Traffic and Transportation Authority, seems to be a replacement from our toothless BMLTA.
Need to read more. If someone could picture a clear picture of how MPC sits as the umbrella planning body on top of local autorities, that will help make the draft document easy to read for many.
COMMENTS
murali772 - 7 April, 2010 - 08:11
@ Public Agenda - Evaaga ildre, mathu yaavaaga?
A comment like yours, without listing valid reasonings, even as some of the regular naysayers have more or less corroborated it, is perhaps an indication that praja.in as the debating platform of the upper house is an idea whose time has come.
idontspam - 7 April, 2010 - 08:20
Why managment of $$$ is left out? How is that going to work? Same way as it is now? When wards get responsibilities they should also get $$$. Maybe in proportion to revenue generated. Else only headaches are getting shared no rewards.
silkboard - 30 March, 2010 - 08:13
Yet to read and understand this in detail. Sounds very confusing if you don't read carefully. The councillors and corporators stay, but there would be Metropolitan Council (MPC) on top that would bind multiple local areas from planning perspective. How will the MPC work with local authorities in the BMR region to write development plans?
BTW, some very basic questions
- How many local governemnts do we have in the BAngalore Metro Area. BBMP, and?
- What will make MPC's master plan recommendations binding to the local governments it is built on top of?
- Will BMRDA, BDA continue to exist along with MPC?
- What will make BMTTA (the rehashed BMLTA in the proposal) recommendations binding to BMTC, BMRC, BARL etc?
Need to read carefully. Don;t think I am in a position for a critical review yet.
murali772 - 31 March, 2010 - 07:10
With this, praja.in is perhaps moving a step closer to becoming the the Upper House for the city, as also the state. And, indeed that's the way things needs to be.
Public Agenda - 31 March, 2010 - 16:08
evaga bekagilla
PRAJA.IN COMMENT GUIDELINES
Posting Guidelines apply for comments as well. No foul language, hate mongering or personal attacks. If criticizing third person or an authority, you must be fact based, as constructive as possible, and use gentle words. Avoid going off-topic no matter how nice your comment is. Moderators reserve the right to either edit or simply delete comments that don't meet these guidelines. If you are nice enough to realize you violated the guidelines, please save Moderators some time by editing and fixing yourself. Thanks!