HOT TOPICS
SPOTLIGHT AGENCIES
Will BIAL (New Blr Airport) return the UDF to us?
Written By silkboard - 6 July, 2011
BIAL Bangalore PPP Transparency Citizen Reports Transportation public transport Aviation
Except for sporadic reports on progress of some "reopen HAL airport" related appeals in the courts, BIAL is rarely in the news these days. After some allegations of misdeeds in the way land was acquired around, and perhaps even for the airport, dust has settled there as well. For me, I am trying to make sense of the PPP aspect, how exactly has the "public" participated in this exercise.
BIAL collects UDF (User Development Fee) from users of the airport. Here is some text on why and how much (PDF on BIAL site, page 5)
The User Development Fee is a fee charged by the airport to develop world class facilities. UDF would apply only from/after the date of operation of the new airport, and would enable BIAL to make the project viable.
Next, GVK acquired some stake in the airport about two years ago. Quoting Livemint report of the time, on "valuation:
With this, GVKPIL, which also runs the Mumbai airport, has increased its stake to 29% in Bial. The Bangalore airport, opened in May 2008, handled 8.7 million passengers in the first year and has been valued at around $1 billion (Rs4,630 crore).
On the gains made by L&T
L&T, which exited the airport project, got Rs105 per share, a return of at least 10 times in five years. The stake acquisition, announced on Sunday, comes on the heels of GVK buying a 12% stake from another shareholder last month.
That 12% stake was acquired from Zurich Airport. Quoting Business-standard July 17, 2010
In November, GVK had acquired 12 per cent of Zurich Airport’s stake in BIAL for Rs 484.6 crore. Both the deals priced BIAL shares at Rs 105 apiece.
Enough of quotes etc, Key point is, the investors got "10 times" their money in just over four years.
Last, "sources" say that BIAL is in black now, has been profitable for a few months or better now.
Now, to end this post, the point is this.
- Why is UDF a fee, and not an exercise to "increase" public's share (via GoK, or some other vehicle) in the PPP? After all the UDF is collected to "develop world class facilities" in a PPP. Granted that private entities take business risk when investing in a PPP. But so does the public (via government holdings). And when public is paying to fund further development, why is that to be seen as "fee", and not as "stake expansion".
- Now that we know that investors got out with a windfall, and the airport is profitable, will BIAL be nice and return the UDF back to us? We can't legally demand that. But do private parties have moral obligation to share the "windfall", esp when part of the windfall has come from tax paying citizens themselves?
- Till when will this UDF continue to be collected. If the Airport is profitable, and even more valuable, what is the reason to persist with it?
I have nothing against BIAL, not as jazzy as some people wish it to be, but its the most efficient of all new airports with good services. I also understand the very valid "what if the Aviation industry had seen a de-growth instead" argument, yes private parties take some "risk". However, I want to know more about how these large PPPs work or should be structured, and how exactly does the 'public', or citizens (who may part with land, who may pay usage or development fees) participate in sharing or shielding the "risk".
COMMENTS
rackstar - 6 July, 2011 - 05:04
If UDF's were to be returned then share price would have been 10 Rs instead of 105 Rs.
silkboard - 6 July, 2011 - 07:53
Assuming 10 mill passengers per year, 80% domestic, 20% international. At Rs 200 per domestic, and 1000 per international, you get:
- 80 lakh x 200 = Rs 160 Crores
- 20 lakh x 1000 = Rs 200 Crores
Rs 360 Crores per year from UDF. About $90 million / year
See this in context of BIAL's value, which as of last year was in excess of Rs 4000 crores ($1b). Is it all due to UDF? What will the value be without the UDF? Don't have enough time right now build a DCF model.
Do we have the right to see their balance sheets? How do we know that they are not running a tight enough operation so that they can justify the need for UDF? After all, they have no competition to worry about.
See, they have done nothing wrong. UDF was promised, it is a perfectly legal thing for the them to collect and use. But when people are making 10x returns in 4 years time, should they have some obligation to the "public" in a PPP company or not is my question. Should there be a "windfall tax"on such monopoly situation PPPs?
As for how to return the money, there are a lot of ways BIAL can do this. 320 crore for two years, Rs 640 crore can fund Bus Priority System on many Big-10 routes :) That would be some real corporate social responsibility, BIAL will live on for ages in case studies and on the streets of Bangalore !
If you say P/E ratio 15, then 360 crore UDF would result in market cap of 5400 crore. That much is just by udf alone. Others factors would be maintainance and other sources of income. Yes, metro or BIAL are public as govt has 26% stake, so all information is accessible by RTI.
silkboard - 7 July, 2011 - 05:54
Instead of paying to airport, we now pay via the airline.
Hmm, so you are saying PSA Sir, that we can protest by choosing 2 day-long train to Delhi. Or may be, by chartering a private plan from HAL Airport :)
Unprecedented protection from competition should imply "windfall tax" in return. Government's share in the PPP is useless anyway, Govt wouldn't want to sell their share and create a purely private monopoly.
Sounds socialist isn't it. But then a PPP has govt and public involved. If Airport promoters were to take all the risks - acquire land yourself at market prices, put HAL Airport out of competition through superior service, then why not. Keep all the returns with you, 10x or 100x.
psaram42 - 6 July, 2011 - 16:59
I believe that the user development fee is now included in the ticket fare. The UDF so collected by the carrier companies in turn goes to BIAL, which maintains the airport. This is perfectly legal. One can protest by choosing other modes of transport.
PRAJA.IN COMMENT GUIDELINES
Posting Guidelines apply for comments as well. No foul language, hate mongering or personal attacks. If criticizing third person or an authority, you must be fact based, as constructive as possible, and use gentle words. Avoid going off-topic no matter how nice your comment is. Moderators reserve the right to either edit or simply delete comments that don't meet these guidelines. If you are nice enough to realize you violated the guidelines, please save Moderators some time by editing and fixing yourself. Thanks!