HOT TOPICS
SPOTLIGHT AGENCIES
Halt massive Bangalore Metro investments, give satellite town connectivity its due first
Written By silkboard - 19 August, 2013
Bangalore Satellite Towns CRS Complaint BMRCL Commuter rail
Have been reading up on Metro's Phase 2A and Phase 3 plans and few thoughts cross my mind.
- Longer term sustainable growth of Bangalore depends on how we manage growth of BMRDA region and Satellite areas
- All the focus is on the central city area (loosely speaking, the region bound by Outer Ring Road)
- Cost of land, freedom to plan development around a planned mass transit - we are losing on these counts in the peripheral areas as the central city area is taking away all the mindshare and investments
- The immidiate peripheries are, arguably, already hitting into problems of congestion
- Options like BRTS on major radial roads (NH7, NH4-East, NH4-West, SH16, SH17), or commuter rail with different charectiristics from that of Metro (stations at longer distance, larger carrying capacity, higher average speeds) along the rail routes heading out of the city are rarely being discussed
- Mobility thoughts for the satellite areas have primarily focused on roads (Satellite Town Ring Road, Peripheral Ring Road, Intermediate Ring Road etc)
Questions that come to my mind
- Are we losing the plot as far as future of Bangalore is concerned?
- Do we, the Bangaloreans prefer transit corridor based spread out metropolitan area that has cost-of-living spread out evenly across the whole area?
- Or, do we prefer a more dense, more expensive and more exclusive with time central city area with unplanned ribbon development along crowded radial roads beyond the Outer Ring Road?
- How do we get the attention towards sustainable people mobility investments in these areas beyond ORR?
- Or shall we not, and just wait for the unplanned development and higher costs (in future) to dictate mobility choices much the same way we are doing today for the central city area (forced to do the expensive Metro)?
Thoughts that I jump to
- Metro is "fixing" the chaos of today
- By ignoring to invest in satellite town / Bangalore Rural connectivity through sustainable options, are we unknowingly creating the chaos for tomorrow
-
Could there be a design paradign like this:
- Metro only inside Outer Ring Road (with a few exceptions)
- Cheaper options for peripheries and satellite areas, only because they are still an option.
And I think of money
- This way or that way, we, the public would be footing big part of the HUGE bill for Metro
- If we are not, please enlighten and advise why the same financial wizardry is not being applied to solve other areas too?
- If we are, then what if we demand scrutiny on the justifications for spending that money on taking Metro beyond Outer Ring Road when cheaper options exist today, but may not exist tomorrow (which is when Metro ?
Is there a way we can use
- The plight of peripheral areas (no mobility plans in place or in action for areas beyond ORR), and
- Poorer people being forced to live farther and farther down the city, and being forced to spend hours to commuter to their workplaces
... to ask for
-
A pause on further Metro investments, till ...
- we get a clear answer on - who is responsible for growth of larger Bangalore (BMRDA area, Bangalore Rural, Satelite Areas)
- state government stops discriminating against these areas in terms of planning and investment on mobility
I don't know what we can action on this, if at all we can. But stirring a debate to scrutinize Metro Phase2A and Phase3 costs with this angle shoul dbe possible.
Yes, I sort of understand some of the terms that may come up - demand based planning, growth projections, gestation periods, high capex, gestation period etc etc. But I do know this too, that whenever you think of or plan for future, there are assumptions, biases as well as creativity in whatever models you create for justifying, planning and funding projects. My bias, if I may, is towards better sustainable, cheaper to build and operate options for mobility, and done in ways that would shape Bangalore of tomorrow, and not wrap around the amoeba that our satellite areas are turning into as we sit on approving some really large money projects.
cheers,
SB aka Pranav
COMMENTS
idontspam - 20 August, 2013 - 05:45
We are late, but, whether or not we choose one model over the other, we have lost the plot on 2 counts. One that there is already an economy which ties in the sattellite brownfield towns you cant walk away from. Two that ribbon development & lack of zoning is only pushing this into a crisis. Answer 2 both is to attack them simultaneously, not one or the other.
Build commuter rail & control zoning along the corridors, dont allow sprawl in the form of ribbon development along each & every road/transport infra that is being built. Follow the concept of street categorization & make them function as per the definition. Develop/Redevelop areas to ensure spatial geometry allows for open areas & mixed use along specific categories of roads with public transport. Break up BMRDA region into multiple corporations & decentralize with clear zoning & plan guidelines.
GoK get your f****** town planning act together. You cant sleep on the job anymore. Dont think you know everything, or need have ALL the people inhouse, ask a wide variety of people & come to an informed conclusion. DO IT FAST.
Don't think we are late, and I feel its not an either/or situati
silkboard - 20 August, 2013 - 06:22
- Metro within the Outer Ring Road bound area - the mobility fix for this relatively more dense area
- Cheaper, faster to implement options for connecting larger Satellite area
What is the driver here?
- It is not the "Metro" vs "Cheaper options for Satellites" areas debate.
- Is anyone planning Satellite mobility yet? It is time, we may not be that late yet.
And if the plan happens to be Metro itself again, that too is okay, however"
- Please justify costs and reasons for overlooking other options that may be cheaper
- If justification exists, that too is okay. Good. But then, please focus Metro Phase 2 on Kengeri, Hoskote, Doddaballapur, BG Park inwards, do justice to satellite connectivity by putting a plan and money on it
Shape the city, manage its growth. Don't be at the tail, always behind and in "fix" mode all the time.
And then, only way to force such thinkig that I can think of is protest over these super huge Metro investments. Or else we may not make the headlines.
idontspam - 20 August, 2013 - 06:34
I second the thoughts of stopping Phase 2 of the metro with a pre-escalation estimated cost of 26,000 crores. It can give you 400kms of commuter rail 3 times over at the current estimated cost.
GoK, give people a reason why commuter rail is not being done & then move ahead with whatever else you are doing. Let people then be the judge.
I am definitely taking a stance against the metro till such time the commuter rail is put on stream concretely & not just in words. I will also support any activity which will go against the metro as I believe it is prioritizing a few rich people first over the broader population.
srinidhi - 20 August, 2013 - 08:33
Thought that was some good initiative that DULT had taken to try get BRT on ORR from Silkboard to Hebbal..last I heard of it was in 2010 where BDA was getting the DPR done for it..no news after that!
Is it that talk of metro ph 2a and 3 scuttled the BRT plans? Since the stretch on road is anyways signal free, I was thinking the LRT at grade option can be looked into on the same BRT tracks, as they offer advantages including cost, over BRT
Btw where is the Ganapathy temple that is being referred to in the BMRC communique?
Naveen - 25 August, 2013 - 17:20
Syed,
It is natural & also expected of us citizens to raise questions as to why only metro is progressing & why not the others but unbecoming to unnecessarily blame BMRC for pursuing what they are supposed to be doing. That BMRC is an SPV is the reason why metro is progressing should have been obvious to all prajas a long time ago. It hasnt been mere mention of metro on praja for long now - it has been heavy bias & criticism whenever there has been talk about it, nothing else.
Remember what I said when CM cleared suburban rail? That an SPV was the first & foremost need - we needed to pursue this with DULT, ignoring all the rest. In my opinion, new trains are useless since they are operated according to SWR's convenience.
I dont think metro & suburban rail are connected at all - they serve different areas & sections & will only be feeding one another. So, better leave them detached & pursue both with equal vigor, even if there are budget constraints.
Its obvious (to me, at least) that all lines proposed by BMRC in 2nd/3rd phases will not see the light of day anytime soon, at least not as being made out to be. Perhaps the extension to whitefield & Bommasandra may get done, others may get postponed or something like that is bound to happen. There are much larger issues like viability, ridership, costs, approvals, etc that decide outcomes besides very long construction periods. Doing DPRs is only just the first step - even that takes 18 months. And BTW, I agree completely with what you said - that metro is trying to solve yesterday's problems for few areas.
When pockets begin to hurt, the ones responsible will naturally be forced to look at cheaper options. Till then, they may remain captivated & enamored, but it will have to end at some stage - we only need to hasten that process without tilting excessively in favor of one or the other. Already there are questions about metro exceeding budget targets, so it may happen sooner than expected.
I dont think I ranted about railways - I quoted what CTTP by Rites (a railways body itself) has stated. There are issues in the way railways functions that are posing serious problems. Kharge is on record stating that he has to deal with 25000 cr losses (& counting). Whilst you choose to call what I mentioned as rants, you also say that railways is highly politicized ministry, nothing done on need and rational basis, everything as per politics, louder the noise bigger the booty, karnataka politicians to learn from Kerala, etc. Do these rants (if I may call them that) not go well beyond what I said? All of what I quoted & what you say are true though, isnt it?
PRAJA.IN COMMENT GUIDELINES
Posting Guidelines apply for comments as well. No foul language, hate mongering or personal attacks. If criticizing third person or an authority, you must be fact based, as constructive as possible, and use gentle words. Avoid going off-topic no matter how nice your comment is. Moderators reserve the right to either edit or simply delete comments that don't meet these guidelines. If you are nice enough to realize you violated the guidelines, please save Moderators some time by editing and fixing yourself. Thanks!