thumb_up 0

COMMENTS

SB: What you say about regulatory role being more lucrative ( will that be detrimental to public good?) is shocking news to me as it turns upside down the notions I had till now. "...and then things should move." -- any idea how things might move and in which direction? City Zen

• thumb_up Like
• · login or register to post comments

Private transport is partially liberalised in KA. Although there are a lot of private buses / air service etc, we still lack a strong competitive environment. The private bus lobby was shrill in blocking the Mangalore-Bangalore train service. It was indeed a miracle that the train service was pushed through.

• thumb_up Like
• · login or register to post comments

Not just UP, many more states are moving in this direction. Whereas Karnataka, with all its human resource capital, should have been in the forefront of such reforms, it is now tragically seen to be falling far behind. And, the once BIMARU states are taking over.

And, Cadambi - private sector has played a role in Karnataka, particularly in South Kanara, from long. But, true liberalisation is a far way off. More on it, you may read at

http://traffic-transport-solutions.blogspot.com/

Muralidhar Rao

• thumb_up Like
• · login or register to post comments

A small point if I may. When government stops doing business itself, and moves back to the regulatory role, it actually makes things easy as well as lucrative for netas and babus. The corruption moves to higher levels and amounts involved become concentrated and huge. [There was an interesting editorial in biz-standard recently on the big-ticket corruption, where they tried to draw a correlation between development of states and level at which corruption plays]

When you are regulating, you are dealing with larger businesses, you get to feel more powerful (or demand more for clearances or renewals). And obviously, dealing with public complaints about poor quality becomes easier - just change or pressurize the service provider. Its really a win win for Netas and Babus on both the counts (votes and money), and one CM of a particular state in the north clearly realizes that.

Now, let me end this with some even more opinionated and loose talk. Bangalore's real estate, and Bellary's iron ore have kept the netas busy over last 8 years or so. And perhaps that is showing now. Once their "interest" spreads around and they realize the true merits of withdrawing to regulate, then things should move.

• thumb_up Like
• · login or register to post comments

TRAI, SEBI are two regulatory bodies in the country that I can readily think of, that have matured over the years, and are today doing a fairly decent job.

Regulatory Bodies are never constituted as government organisations. There is wide representation of all interested parties, including consumers, and the government.

In the Telecom sector, the way the call charges have been dropping, and the keen tussle between the various players over band-widths, etc are clear indications of the effective role played by TRAI. With Airtel and Vodafone pulling in one direction, and TATAs and Reliance the other, and TRAI mediating, the consumer gets to become the real king. That is what has to happen in each and every sector.

The iron ore racketeering in Karnataka is because the sector today is in the 'control' of the state ministry. Once the ministry is replaced by a properly constituted regulatory body, the scenario will change, and the state overall will benefit.

The only regulatory body in Karnataka, viz KERC, is today playing the role more of a Consumer interest group than a regulator, because the vested interests have thwarted the reforms process.

Muralidhar Rao

• thumb_up Like
• · login or register to post comments