HOT TOPICS
SPOTLIGHT AGENCIES
Hall of Shame
Written By s_yajaman - 1 September, 2008
Bengalooru suddi Bangalore Corruption Karnataka Media Reports
Karnataka made it to the Hall of Shame. Please see this report in today's DH.
http://www.deccanherald.com/Content/Sep12008/...
"This has been confirmed in a 2007-08 survey, conducted by Transparency International India and the Centre for Media Studies, New Delhi. the state which was ranked 17th in a 2005 Transparency International India (TII) survey, has now climbed to the top slot of “very highly corrupt states.”
Not surprised that we have reached the state that we see in Bangalore - non-existent roads, roads developing potholes in 3 months, the raids on various public officials yielding crores of unaccounted money, benami properties, etc.
The Jeevan Bima Nagar Revenue office of the BBMP has been making my wife run around for the past 2 months for a khata transfer. This was to have been done in 45 days. The file is still sitting there. Our plan is to file an RTI for this if this does not get done by this week. If they can make educated people run around, you can imagine what they must be doing to not so educated/illiterate people.
Srivathsa
COMMENTS


idontspam - 6 July, 2010 - 15:25
Then a commenter (idontspam) suddenly mistakes me for Public Agenda.
Thats true, my bad. Really though you believe criminality and corruption is not corelated? tch tch.

See the details for yourself - actual report here. I don't know how KA is #1 as DH put it, performance is pathetic never the less.
Notice also that the focus of the study is below poverty line (BPL) families, in select districts. KA study included Bangalore, Raichur, Chitradurga and Bidar.
Thanks,
Ravi

Four categories of corruption - KA top slot in V.H.Corrupt
s_yajaman - 1 September, 2008 - 10:28
There were 4 categories of corruption
a. Alarmingly high - UP,J&K,Bihar
b. Very Highly corrupt - KA, TN
c. Highly Corrupt - Delhi and some others
d. Moderately corrupt - AP, Maharashtra
From 2005 there was one particular family in power in Karnataka. Says something?
Srivathsa

murali772 - 2 September, 2008 - 11:06
SB - Your post has prompted me to pull out the following from my personal blog. I had made a convenient differentiation between bribe and 'mamool'. Bribe was when you wanted to jump the queue, whereas 'mamool' was for getting your rightful position in the queue. I had little option other than to come to terms with paying 'mamools'. When the demand became far higher than the term would normally imply is when trouble arose. There were plenty of instances; I can write reams on those. Once, I even went on National television, Nalini Singh interviewing me, and stated it all, inviting the government to arrest me since as the 'giver', I am equally guilty. It's on the back of all these experiences that I am saying that the only solution is less government.
raaj-less inspection
India must easily hold the world record for the number of laws and rules that the country is governed by, though when it comes to compliance and enforcement, I am sure, we would rank right at the bottom. Many of these laws have been handed down from the Britisher's times. And, even though the Britishers may have re-written, or even rescinded many of those that have no relevance in today's world, we still retain them. And, given half a chance, the babu will use it against you to extract his pound of flesh, using his army of inspectors.
As the law minister in the Vajpayee cabinet, Arun Shourie had set himself to address this issue, the then government generally having a liberalist view in these matters. But, inspite of himself, he could not achieve much, giving an indication of the enormity of the task, and the situation improved only marginally, if at all.
Well, like I have stated elsewhere, it is a true testimony to the spirit of Indian entrepreneurship that it is flourishing inspite of all these.
During the times I was running a manufacturing unit, I had set up a kind of a procedure to handle the inspectors who were there almost every second day. From the very beginning itself, I had made sure that we were complying with all the important aspects of the rules, making fresh, even if sometimes costly, investments as were required for the purpose. As such, we had a near perfect set up, which would even then have perhaps been today's ISO 14001 compliant. But, considering the number of laws, and the rules thereunder, and their complexities, it was almost impossible to comply with all the aspects of each of them totally. And, the inspectors had quite perfected the art of looking for these, irrespective of whether they had any direct bearing on the primary concern they were supposed to address.
I had an elderly man for a manager who, after attending to all the paper work meticulously, had himself perfected the art of countering the inspectors' ways, and limiting the 'mamools' to within reasonable limits. We had built ourselves a reputation for taking matters to the highest levels if the inspectors acted too greedy, though this came about through paying some hefty prices in the early stages. Consequently, the inspectors generally collected their mamools at the minimum levels and went away without creating much of a problem.
In such a scenario, the Department of Industries, GoK, alone had the stipulation that the annual certification for compliance under the Boilers & Pressure Vessels Act, be obtained from a 'chartered engineer'. Over the many years that I had been running the unit, I would have had to interact with quite a few of them. Each, without exception, I must record here, went about his task meticulously, earning every pie of the fee he was charging. And, the fee generally was lower than that charged by the other departments who sent their inspectors essentially to collect the mamools in the pretence of the inspection.
Very clearly the 'chartered engineer' route provided the necessary accountability, as well as relief to the industry from the inspector raaj, and therefore provided the ready model for other departments to follow, assuming of course they are looking for one.
Muralidhar Rao
PRAJA.IN COMMENT GUIDELINES
Posting Guidelines apply for comments as well. No foul language, hate mongering or personal attacks. If criticizing third person or an authority, you must be fact based, as constructive as possible, and use gentle words. Avoid going off-topic no matter how nice your comment is. Moderators reserve the right to either edit or simply delete comments that don't meet these guidelines. If you are nice enough to realize you violated the guidelines, please save Moderators some time by editing and fixing yourself. Thanks!