HOT TOPICS
SPOTLIGHT AGENCIES
A most compelling story
Written By murali772 - 14 November, 2008
Bangalore Infrastructure Congestion Democracy Namma Metro Media Reports BMRC public transport Participation Metro Rail
I was born and raised in Bangalore in a traditional old bungalow in the heart of the city in National College Circle in Basavangudi. It was gifted to me by my late aunt with much love over 20 years ago. To my great sorrow, this property will soon be destroyed by the disastrous planning of the 'Namma Metro'.
I say enough, it is not 'Nimma Ooru'. It is 'Namma Ooru', whether one has lived here for 50 years or 5 months. It should not become Nimma metro, planned by ever changing bureaucrats with no coordination or consideration for the residents. Bangalore needs infrastructure that is effective, yet does not cause needless harm and inconvenience to its residents. We need the government to come up with a comprehensive, coordinated development plan. One that is open to public scrutiny, comment and approval. I understand that the government wants Nimma metro to project the image of the new Bangalore. Fine, let it go underground as has been done in major cities — even in Stalinist Russia, they went underground. If they could go underground in London a century ago, then surely with the amazing technology we have now, it should be quite easy to do so here. Moreover, Nimma metro should use public land when above ground and for heaven's sake, take down our ill planned flyover to make way for it. Only when all this is done will it truly be a Namma Metro, one that we can all proudly stand behind. We do not need to destroy the past and present to make way for the future. We do not need to lose the soul of the city to gain the world.
For the full story, click on:
http://www.deccanherald.com/Content/Nov142008/realty20081113100566.asp
Today, it is this lady's home. Tomorrow, it could be yours. Is this the kind of development we want?
Muralidhar Rao
COMMENTS

Disappointed that it is not underground
Vinay - 14 November, 2008 - 13:04
Yes, it's more expensive and all that - but in the overall analysis it wouldn't be that much more expensive. Think of escalation and cost overruns due to countless litigation, PILs, protests and demonstrations. And what about the environment? Trees etc..
Having tracks underground, and most of the station underground, BMRCL should have been given control of the real estate at the stations. In German stations, we have supermarkets, stores, and in some cases even complete shopping malls inside underground stations!! I was visualizing something like that when I first heard of the metro. Fat chance..
Since we have gone ahead with this policy of having the trains on pillars, nothing can be done now about the beautiful structures and trees, sad as it sounds.

So the whole reason for considering a metro in crowded inner city (ie. lack of space) has left aside.
What all this will do to cityscape is a different matter. Never mind those unlucky souls living near these elevated tracks as they will have a eyesore and an earache to deal with (unless more ugly looking noise barriers are also added to the plan).
ASJ

Though I have not done a cost analysis..
Vinay - 14 November, 2008 - 15:46
Anyway, all this is hypothetical talk since the Metro construction is already well underway.
Maybe the very best thing that can happen is to get hold of a huge huge portion of barren un - cultivable land and create a huge planned city, putting into practice all the lessons we've learnt. I'm dreaming of course, but nothing wrong with dreaming, huh? :-)

Frank Lloyd Wright masterpiece destruction
mcadambi - 14 November, 2008 - 16:16
I wrote a strongly toned message to the top honchos of Namma Metro on this regard. I wanted to bring up this topic during the meeting, but i am not in the country at present.
Below is a copy of my letter which I addressed to N Sivasailam, B S Sudhir Chandra and Mr Pahuja as well as Smt Malini, the niece of Komer Srinivasa Iyengar.
---
To Whom it may concern,
As a supporter of Namma Metro, especially with regard to cases such as Namma Metro Vs CMH Road residents and Namma Metro Vs Mahakavi Kuvempu Road residents, I am plain disgusted to note that Namma metro does not care a inch about our city's heritage.
This is with regard to acquisition of Shri Komer Srinivasa Iyengar's masterpiece home in Basavangudi. This is the equivalent of acquiring Frank Lloyd Wright's masterpiece homes in Pennsylvania for a rail road!
I am sure the head honchos of Namma metro such as yourselves are not from Bangalore and much less care about our culture. It is just another pay cheque for all of you.
It is often said that the "devil" in in the details. Just by sitting in your air conditioned offices and not visiting facts on ground, you assume that the home of Komer Srinivasa Iyengar is just another property to be acquired.
Please consider this strongly worded letter as a strong note of protest. When people like me, strong supporters of the Metro now start to criticise the Metro - then i think there is something terribly wrong with the actions of the Metro.
Since i am also a supporter of Kannada culture - i plan to write to the Department of Kannada and Culture, the Urban Arts Commission as well as Karnataka Rakshana Vedike should the acquisition of Komer Srinivasa Iyengar's home continue.
I hope you will all exercise caution and foresight on this regard.
Regards,
Malolan R Cadambi,
Malleswaram, Bengaluru.
----------

Need not be completely 'buried'
Vinay - 16 November, 2008 - 17:12
PRAJA.IN COMMENT GUIDELINES
Posting Guidelines apply for comments as well. No foul language, hate mongering or personal attacks. If criticizing third person or an authority, you must be fact based, as constructive as possible, and use gentle words. Avoid going off-topic no matter how nice your comment is. Moderators reserve the right to either edit or simply delete comments that don't meet these guidelines. If you are nice enough to realize you violated the guidelines, please save Moderators some time by editing and fixing yourself. Thanks!